Fair Distribution | COVID-19 Vaccine | UPSC
COVID-19: What will be a fair policy to distribute vaccine
WHY IN NEWS:
The question of equitable distribution of a vaccine is as much a global concern as it is local
SYLLABUS COVERED: GS 4 : Medical Ethics : Fair Distribution | COVID-19 Vaccine | UPSC
- You will understand the dire need of a policy.
- Questions popping out of this issue
- Role of state
FAIR POLICY TO DISTRIBUTE VACCINE
- There are ethical aspect as well, which demands an equitable policy of distribution.
WHY WE NEED A POLICY
- We also know that the pandemic is a global phenomenon, and any piecemeal or local management would not suffice.
- It is imperative that a global policy of distribution be in place so that all countries can receive the benefit almost simultaneously.
- No country is safe if only its own citizens are inoculated.
- Question of an ethical and equitable distribution of the vaccine is as much a global concern as it is local.
- Is there a moral obligation on the part of a country to help the distant needy ?
- Do agencies funding the research or the researchers or government authorities or citizens decide on a global policy of distribution?
- It is a known fact that when a quantity of an export increases, the cost of resource in the exporting country also increases.
- Don’t they all deserve to get the vaccine, before any surplus is sent to another country?
- Would the exporting country be justified in charging a higher price for the vaccine than its actual cost?
- The cost of the vaccine and its possible loss will have to be borne by someone.
In the distributive hierarchy, it is always the last receiver that has to bear the cost — likely to be the more vulnerable and needy people of the society.
- How do we circumvent the human and economic cost of this eventuality?
- This brings us to the other question about the modalities of distributing a scarce resource locally.
- Should it be determined by need, affordability, vulnerability or some other criterion or a combination of all?
- It may be argued that healthcare workers fighting the pandemic at the forefront are most vulnerable to contracting the disease and hence they need to get it first.
- Alternatively, one could argue that the elderly with comorbidities need the vaccine first.
- But then, the elderly are not fighting the virus at the forefront, so they may not be at a greater risk.
- Again, one could argue that those in 18-50 age group, who have to step out of their homes for a living would need the vaccine first.
- So, do they deserve the vaccine first while the health workers get the protective gear and the elderly stays at home?
Several factors such as the population size, demographics, indigenous production capacities, short- and long-term needs, affordability and vulnerability will have to be kept in mind .
- This would be a policy that would need to be reviewed and reframed.
- To make sure that that does not happen, the government would need to intervene to regulate and cap the price to avoid profiteering
- The issue would again be a matter of local / national policy.
- These are not easy questions to answer.
- In fact, they become all the more difficult when the race is against time.
- We need to put our heads together to figure out a local as well as a global policy of distribution.
- Such policy should benefits as well as the burdens of this much-valued resource in the most equitable manner.
It is important that we garner public opinion about how this task is to be accomplished and the war against COVID-19 won.