IASbhai Daily Editorial Hunt | 3rd Oct 2020

I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions.– Stephen Covey

Dear Aspirants
IASbhai Editorial Hunt is an initiative to dilute major Editorials of leading Newspapers in India which are most relevant to UPSC preparation –‘THE HINDU, LIVEMINT , INDIAN EXPRESS’ and help millions of readers who find difficulty in answer writing and making notes everyday. Here we choose two editorials on daily basis and analyse them with respect to UPSC MAINS 2020.

EDITORIAL HUNT #170 :“CAG Audit Report 2020 Analysis | UPSC

CAG Audit Report 2020 Analysis | UPSC

M. Govinda Rao
CAG Audit Report 2020 Analysis | UPSC

M. Govinda Rao is Chief Economic Adviser, Brickwork Ratings. He was former Director, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, and Member, Fourteenth Finance Commission.


Flagging cess non-transfer, its economic impact


The C&AG’s observations in its financial audit report relate to the denial of States’ share in the divisible taxes pool



CAG Audit 2020 Report has raised alarms on devolution of funds with Centre and State. Substantiate -(GS 3)


  • CAG Observations
  • GST Shortfall
  • Cess collection and distribution.


The Financial Audit Report of the Government of India by the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG) for 2018-19 placed in Parliament on September 23 has raised significant issues of a lack of transparency and propriety.

  • COMPENSATION CESS : The Opposition-ruled States have criticised the Centre on the short transfer of Goods and Services Tax (GST) compensation cess revenues to the GST Compensation Fund.

The C&AG’s report stated that the Government of India did not transfer ₹6,466 crore of compensation cess revenue in 2017-18 and ₹40,806 crore in 2018-19.

  • CLUTCHED AMOUNT : Thus, a total of ₹47,272 crore was retained in the Consolidated Fund of India (CFI).
  • RETAINED IGST : The report also alluded to the non-apportionment of a portion of Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) among the States and retaining it in the CFI.



  • MORE FUEL TO THE FIRE : At a time when Union government’s refusal to compensate States for the shortfall in the collection of GST as per the agreement the C&AG’s report has only added more fuel to the fire.
  • CONCERNS : These States contend that when there were surplus collections, the Union government appropriated them and when there is a shortfall, it simply distances itself, instead asking States to borrow.


  • MACROECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE : The C&AG’s observations on a non-transfer of cesses, however, has a much larger macroeconomic impact.
  • TOTAL CESS : There are as many as 35 cesses levied by the government of India.
  • PURPOSE OF CESS : These are earmarked taxes and the proceeds should be used for the purposes for which they are levied.
  • CESS COLLECTIONS : A number of reserve funds or development boards have been created for these specified purposes and the collections from the cesses .
  • CESS DISTRIBUTION : They are supposed to be transferred to these funds placed in public accounts for defraying expenditures on the specified purposes.
  • CESS AND CFI : They are not a part of the CFI and cannot be used for defraying regular expenses.

The transactions in public accounts are supposed to be done by the government as a trustee or a banker, and are not subject to vote by Parliament.

  • TOTAL TRANSFERS : The C&AG has pointed out that in 2018-19, the collections from 35 Cesses amounted to nearly ₹2.75-lakh crore of which only ₹1.64-lakh crore was transferred to various reserve funds .
  • SHORT TRANSFER : Thus, the short transfer to the Public Account during the year amounted to ₹1.11-lakh crore payment.


  • PRINCIPLE : Cesses are earmarked taxes and to ensure a minimum allocation to important and priority programmes, this method of financing could be used.
  • ABOLITION OF CESS : Even after a number of cesses and surcharges were abolished when the GST was implemented.

There are as many as 35 cesses levied by the Finance and other Ministries of the Government of India.

  • TAX COMPLIANCE : The ostensible reasoning for levying these cesses is the belief that ring fencing of revenue for specified priority purposes may evoke greater tax compliance for the people .
  • COLLECTION PATTERNS : There is also a possibility of limiting the funding of important and priority areas to the amount of cess collected even when they require much larger amounts.
  • COMPLEXITY: Too many cesses also complicate the tax system and add to administrative and compliance costs.

      IASbhai Windup: 


  • DEVOLUTION OF FUND : Article 270 of the Constitution requires the Union government to distribute the proceeds from all Central taxes listed in the Union List based on the recommendation of the Finance Commission.
  • EXCLUSIONS : However, Article 271 excludes the distribution of the revenue from any surcharge or cess levied by the Union government for any specified purpose.
  • SHARE OF STATES : After the Fourteenth Finance Commission recommended that the share of the States in the divisible pool be pegged at 42%, almost all discretionary increases in taxes were done by levying cesses and surcharges.

The States’ share in the gross Central taxes was 35% in 2015-16, the first year of the 14th FC recommendation.

  • DEPRECIATION : But decreased to 32% in 2019-20.In the current year, it could be less than 30% .#Pandemic
  • ROLE OF FC : As the Finance Commissions are appointed once in five years, the Union government can raise additional revenue from taxes mainly through the levy of cesses and surcharges to avoid sharing them with the States.
       SOURCES:   THE HINDU EDITORIAL HUNT | CAG Audit Report 2020 Analysis | UPSC


If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for Daily Current Affairs , Editorial Analysis & Answer writing video tutorials. You can also find us on Twitter and Facebook.

You May Also Like