IASbhai Daily Editorial Hunt | 30th Dec

“Take up one idea. Make that one idea your life–think of it, dream of it, live on that idea. Let the brain, muscles, nerves, every part of your body, be full of that idea, and just leave every other idea alone. This is the way to success.” –Swami Vivekananda

Dear Aspirants
IASbhai Editorial Hunt is an initiative to dilute major Editorials of leading Newspapers in India which are most relevant to UPSC preparation –‘THE HINDU, LIVEMINT , INDIAN EXPRESS’ and help millions of readers who find difficulty in answer writing and making notes everyday. Here we choose two editorials on daily basis and analyse them with respect to UPSC MAINS 2020-21.

EDITORIAL HUNT #290 :“A Global Angle to the Farmer Protests | UPSC

A Global Angle to the Farmer Protests | UPSC

Utsa Patnaik
A Global Angle to the Farmer Protests | UPSC

Utsa Patnaik is Professor Emeritus, Jawaharlal Nehru University

      HEADLINES:

The global angle to the farmer protests

      CENTRAL THEME:

It is not just domestic firms that are potential beneficiaries of the new farm laws; foreign agribusinesses are a danger too

SYLLABUS COVERED: GS 3 : Agriculture

      MAINS QUESTION:

The farmers agitation gives us a glimpse of agrarian distress and marginalisation in the 20th century. Discuss-(GS 3)

      LEARNING: 

  • Historical Significance
  • Recreation of Colonial times
  • A case of unfair trade
  • Way Forward

      INTRODUCTION: 

The farmers’ movement for the repeal of the three farm laws which affect them closely but have been rammed through without consulting them, has now entered its second month.

  • HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE : It is not just about minimum support prices but also about the survival of the entire system of public procurement and distribution of foodgrains.
  • OUR GRANARIES : Without ensuring the economic viability of foodgrains production in North India — the grain basket of the country — no continuity can be ensured for the public procurement and distribution system.
  • FOOD SECURITY : Despite its drawbacks, continues to provide a modicum of food security to vast numbers of our population.

      BODY: 

RECREATION OF COLONIAL TIMES

  • SURPLUS IS THE KEY : Northern industrial countries, namely the United States, European Union (EU), cannot produce the tropical and sub-tropical crops in high demand by their own consumers while they have mountains of surplus grain and dairy products.
  • EXPORT MARKETS : For over two decades, they have put relentless pressure on developing countries to give up their own public procurement systems, insisting that they should buy their food grains from advanced countries.
  • CONTRACT FARMING : While diverting their food-crop-producing land to contract farming of export crops that these industrial countries want but cannot themselves produce.

In short, they want a re-creation of the economic scenario of the colonial period

  • PROVEN EXAMPLE : Dozens of developing countries, ranging from the Philippines in the mid-1990s to Botswana (Africa) a decade later, succumbed to this pressure.
  • RAPID PRODUCTION : They paid the price when with rapid diversion of grain to ethanol production in the U.S. and the EU, world grain prices trebled in a matter of months from end-2007.
  • FOOD RIOTS : Thirty-seven newly import-dependent countries saw food riots, with urban populations being pushed into greater poverty.
  • BUFFER STOCKS : Food security for the developing world is far too important a matter to be left to the global market, but the relentless attack on their public stocking of grain for ensuring food security continues.
  • STAGNANT AGRICULTURAL GROWTH : India had barely managed to pull back from the brink a decade ago: procurement prices were raised substantially after virtually stagnating during the six years preceding the 2008 price-spike.

Grain output in Punjab grew again from near-stagnant levels as economic viability improved

  • POVERTY LINE : Unemployment caused by the 2016 demonetisation followed by the 2020 pandemic has reduced aggregate demand by now to a historic low.

A CASE OF UNFAIR TRADE

  • UNFAIR TRADE PRACTISES : Our farmers have been exposed for no rhyme or reason to unfair trade, and to the volatility of global prices that has plunged them into unrepayable debt and distress.
  • SUBSIDIES IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES : Advanced countries in the mid-1990s, converted their own price support measures to massive subsidies given as direct cash transfers to their own farmers.
  • AGREEMENTS : Transfers that in a blatantly self-serving manner they wrote into the Agreement on Agriculture as ‘not subject to reduction commitments’.

India along with other developing countries signed the Agreement with very little idea of the implications of the small print

  • U.S. ANNUAL FARM OUTPUT : For the U.S., the direct cash transfers it gives to its 2.02 million farmers, amounting to a huge half or more of its annual farm output value, uses up only 1% of its budget.
  • ECONOMIC IMPOSSIBILITY : For India, over 50% of the entire central government annual Budget would be required to give even a quarter of annual farm output value to our 120 million farmers.

IT’S ABOUT A REASONABLE PRICE

  • MODEST LIVING : All they want is a reasonable price for the vital crops they produce for the nation, so that they can cover costs and live at a modest standard.

In Indian circumstances, the price support system is in fact the only feasible one

  • AGRONOMIC PRACTICES : The solution lies in introducing improved agronomic practices such as the System of Rice Intensification which economises water, not in reducing rice production.
  • LOWEST PAY : Our farmers are among the lowest cost producers in the world, and the support prices in 2013-14 at the prevailing exchange rate of ₹60.5 per dollar were well below global prices, which means that actual support was negative.

RIGHT ASSESSMENT

  • EXPERIENCED FARMERS : Farmers have already experienced contract farming with foreign agribusinesses in Punjab and Haryana.

Despite all its inefficiency and payment delays, they prefer to sell to government agents at the stipulated minimum support prices 

  • DIFFERENCES : They say clearly that they do not wish to deal with powerful, faceless private corporations that renege on price and quantity contracts when it suits them.

      IASbhai Windup: 

THE ‘GREEN ENERGY’ PUSH

  • IMPORTING GRAINS : There are many Indian intellectuals who argue that importing subsidised grain from the North will benefit poor consumers here.

The initial low-priced grain imports, if permitted today, will not only destroy our farmers but will soon give way to a scenario of price spikes and to urban distress as experienced earlier by developing countries forced into import dependence

  • CONTROL OVER GREEN ENERGY : They forget that there is an increasingly powerful opinion advocating ‘green energy’ in advanced countries, pushing for even greater conversion of grain to ethanol.

Anyone with a concern for our own hard- working farmers and poverty-stricken consumers, must support the farmers’ demands against the machinations of both local and global business elites.

       SOURCES:   THE HINDU EDITORIAL HUNT | A Global Angle to the Farmer Protests | UPSC

 

If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for Daily Current Affairs , Editorial Analysis & Answer writing video tutorials. You can also find us on Twitter and Facebook.

0 Shares:
You May Also Like